This week we look at “Inaudibility criteria and alternative methods for controlling music noise levels from late night entertainment,” by James Gardner, Gareth Hance, and Adam Hill, which looks into the complex issue of managing noise from late-night venues without dampening the spirit of live entertainment. This paper is crucial for policymakers, venue owners, and community members alike, as it navigates the fine line between preserving the vibrancy of nightlife and ensuring community peace through innovative noise control strategies.
What is the title of the paper?
Inaudibility criteria and alternative methods for controlling music noise levels from late night entertainment
What is the paper about?
The paper discusses the challenge of regulating music noise levels (MNL) from late-night entertainment, focusing on the subjective criterion of inaudibility and its criticisms. It explores alternative objective methods for controlling entertainment noise, comparing them through a real-world case study to assess their effectiveness against subjective outcomes.
Why should people be interested in this work?
People should be interested in this work because it tackles a significant issue in communities: balancing the enjoyment of live music with the need to control noise pollution. The exploration of objective methods versus subjective inaudibility criteria can impact policy, legal compliance, and the sustainability of the nighttime economy.
What’s the full citation for the paper?
Gardner, J.; G. Hance; A.J. Hill. “Inaudibility criteria and alternative methods for controlling music noise levels from late night entertainment.” Proc. IOA Conference on Reproduced Sound. Bristol, UK, November, 2023.
Where can the paper be accessed online?